Driving Growth Through PDP Optimization

Increasing product page engagement and reducing decision friction on Dell.com

Role

Product Designer

Timeline

4 months

Team

Cross-functional team

Experiment Details

A/B Test, 100+ users

Driving Growth Through PDP Optimization

Increasing product page engagement and reducing decision friction on Dell.com

Role

Product Designer

Timeline

4 months

Team

Cross-functional team

Experiment Details

A/B Test, 100+ users

Project Overview

Dell.com Product Detail Pages attracted high traffic but failed to convert consistently. High bounce rates, elevated DSAT, and content-related confusion (20% of negative feedback) indicated significant decision friction. Users reached PDPs with intent but lacked the clarity needed to confidently purchase, resulting in low conversion rates and measurable quarterly revenue loss.

Project Overview

Dell.com Product Detail Pages attracted high traffic but failed to convert consistently. High bounce rates, elevated DSAT, and content-related confusion (20% of negative feedback) indicated significant decision friction. Users reached PDPs with intent but lacked the clarity needed to confidently purchase, resulting in low conversion rates and measurable quarterly revenue loss.

Problems at a glance

Original PDP layout with dense technical specs and unclear information hierarchy, contributing to decision friction and dissatisfaction rates.

Where users got stuck

High-intent users reached PDPs but lacked the clarity needed to confidently purchase, resulting in drop-offs, low conversion, high dissatisfaction rates and revenue impact.

Evidence & Benchmarks

Industry research (Baymard) and competitor analysis reinforced that content clarity and scannable technical specifications are critical drivers of PDP engagement and conversion, validating our focus on information hierarchy and component placement.

WHAT WE LEARNED FROM THE MARKET

  • Baymard Institute research recommends column layouts, clear grouping by category, and improved readability to reduce cognitive load.

  • Leading e-commerce platforms prioritize scannability and progressive disclosure for specs

  • Competitor analysis revealed clearer grouping of product attributes and comparison cues

HOW RESEARCH INFORMED DESIGN DECISIONS

  • Users scan specs, don’t read → Chunked & grouped specs

  • Too much info causes overload → Progressive disclosure

  • Comparison helps user makes decisions → Clear attribute grouping and comparison cues

Hypothesis

If we improve product clarity by restructuring technical specifications and optimizing the placement of key PDP components, users will better understand the product, feel more confident in their decision, and engage more deeply with the page.

Assumptions

  • Users are willing to buy but lack clarity

  • Content hierarchy impacts confidence

  • Small PDP changes can unlock growth

Experiment: Improving Technical Specifications Layout

I conducted an A/B test in mobile and desktop comparing the original technical specifications layout with a structured, column-based version informed by industry research. The goal was to validate whether improved readability and grouping would reduce decision friction and increase engagement on PDPs.

What I tested

I ran an A/B test comparing the original technical specifications layout with a new structured version, featuring column-based organization, grouped attributes, and improved readability.

Why it mattered

Based on Baymard research and behavioral data, I hypothesized that clearer, scannable specs would reduce cognitive load and DSAT rates and support faster decision-making on PDPs.

How I measured success

Primary metrics included PDP engagement, interaction with specifications, and downstream conversion signals.

Evidence & Benchmarks

Industry research (Baymard) and competitor analysis reinforced that content clarity and scannable technical specifications are critical drivers of PDP engagement and conversion, validating our focus on information hierarchy and component placement.

WHAT WE LEARNED FROM THE MARKET

  • Baymard Institute research recommends column layouts, clear grouping by category, and improved readability to reduce cognitive load.

  • Leading e-commerce platforms prioritize scannability and progressive disclosure for specs

  • Competitor analysis revealed clearer grouping of product attributes and comparison cues

HOW RESEARCH INFORMED DESIGN DECISIONS

  • Users scan specs, don’t read → Chunked & grouped specs

  • Too much info causes overload → Progressive disclosure

  • Comparison helps user makes decisions → Clear attribute grouping and comparison cues

Hypothesis

If we improve product clarity by restructuring technical specifications and optimizing the placement of key PDP components, users will better understand the product, feel more confident in their decision, and engage more deeply with the page.

Assumptions

  • Users are willing to buy but lack clarity

  • Content hierarchy impacts confidence

  • Small PDP changes can unlock growth

A/B test comparing original (A) and optimized (B) technical specifications layouts.

Key Outcomes & Results

+8% PDP engagement

↑ Interaction with technical specifications

↓ Content-related dissatisfaction

Increased interaction with specifications

Reduced content-related dissatisfaction

Where users got stuck

High-intent users reached PDPs but lacked the clarity needed to confidently purchase, resulting in drop-offs, low conversion, high dissatisfaction rates and revenue impact.

Evidence & Benchmarks

Industry research (Baymard) and competitor analysis reinforced that content clarity and scannable technical specifications are critical drivers of PDP engagement and conversion, validating our focus on information hierarchy and component placement.

WHAT WE LEARNED FROM THE MARKET

  • Baymard Institute research recommends column layouts, clear grouping by category, and improved readability to reduce cognitive load.

  • Leading e-commerce platforms prioritize scannability and progressive disclosure for specs

  • Competitor analysis revealed clearer grouping of product attributes and comparison cues

HOW RESEARCH INFORMED DESIGN DECISIONS

  • Users scan specs, don’t read → Chunked & grouped specs

  • Too much info causes overload → Progressive disclosure

  • Comparison helps user makes decisions → Clear attribute grouping and comparison cues

Hypothesis

If we improve product clarity by restructuring technical specifications and optimizing the placement of key PDP components, users will better understand the product, feel more confident in their decision, and engage more deeply with the page.

Assumptions

  • Users are willing to buy but lack clarity

  • Content hierarchy impacts confidence

  • Small PDP changes can unlock growth

Key Learnings

  • Research and benchmarks are most valuable when used to inform concrete design decisions, not just document insights.

  • A/B testing is essential to validate hypotheses and prioritize changes that directly impact engagement and conversion.

  • Improving clarity at the decision point is a powerful growth lever in e-commerce.

Next Steps to Drive Further Growth

  • Deepen experimentation on PDP content and layout

  • Personalize technical specifications by user intent

  • Connect PDP learnings across the funnel

Key Outcomes & Results

+8% PDP engagement

↑ Interaction with technical specifications

↓ Content-related dissatisfaction

Increased interaction with specifications

Reduced content-related dissatisfaction

Key Outcomes & Results

+8% PDP engagement

↑ Interaction with technical specifications

↓ Content-related dissatisfaction

Increased interaction with specifications

Reduced content-related dissatisfaction

Key Learnings

  • Research and benchmarks are most valuable when used to inform concrete design decisions, not just document insights.

  • A/B testing is essential to validate hypotheses and prioritize changes that directly impact engagement and conversion.

  • Improving clarity at the decision point is a powerful growth lever in e-commerce.

Next Steps to Drive Further Growth

  • Deepen experimentation on PDP content and layout

  • Personalize technical specifications by user intent

  • Connect PDP learnings across the funnel

Key Learnings

  • Research and benchmarks are most valuable when used to inform concrete design decisions, not just document insights.

  • A/B testing is essential to validate hypotheses and prioritize changes that directly impact engagement and conversion.

  • Improving clarity at the decision point is a powerful growth lever in e-commerce.

Next Steps to Drive Further Growth

  • Deepen experimentation on PDP content and layout

  • Personalize technical specifications by user intent

  • Connect PDP learnings across the funnel